<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manhattan&#8217;s daytime population: map source found!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/</link>
	<description>My thoughts on GIS, data access, and all things spatial.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Daniel Franklin</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Daniel Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the legwork. The 2007 Time article graphics are online here, by the way:
http://www.time.com/time/2007/america_numbers/commuting.html
This is probably my all-time favorite issue.

I noticed some problems with the Seattle data--for example, it shows the UW campus as empty at night. That&#039;s not even true in the summer, when various camps and conferences use the dorms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the legwork. The 2007 Time article graphics are online here, by the way:<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/2007/america_numbers/commuting.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/2007/america_numbers/commuting.html</a><br />
This is probably my all-time favorite issue.</p>
<p>I noticed some problems with the Seattle data&#8211;for example, it shows the UW campus as empty at night. That&#8217;s not even true in the summer, when various camps and conferences use the dorms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou klepner</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou klepner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Excellent sleuthing, I look forward to future installments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent sleuthing, I look forward to future installments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Romalewski</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Romalewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Good point re: spatial precision vs accuracy.  We do need to know more about how the Oak Ridge data was compiled in order to evaluate it, which is one reason I wanted to write about it here.  I&#039;ve received some feedback already, and will post more after I hear back from the LandScan team directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point re: spatial precision vs accuracy.  We do need to know more about how the Oak Ridge data was compiled in order to evaluate it, which is one reason I wanted to write about it here.  I&#8217;ve received some feedback already, and will post more after I hear back from the LandScan team directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lichanos</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>lichanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-5</guid>
		<description>It is a bit deceptive to talk about these maps of day/night population as though they are the same sort of information as census data.  They are not.  Saying they have higher resolution than census data implies greater spatial precision, but says nothing about the accuracy.

The key word here is &quot;model.&quot;  Oak Ridge people have decided how to estimate the day/night populations based on census data and ancillary data, e.g., journey to work, work location, etc. data.  Census data is not perfect, but it is what it says, the result of a known method of surveying resident populations.  Until I could look under the hood of this model, I&#039;d regard it as interesting, but not to be trusted very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a bit deceptive to talk about these maps of day/night population as though they are the same sort of information as census data.  They are not.  Saying they have higher resolution than census data implies greater spatial precision, but says nothing about the accuracy.</p>
<p>The key word here is &#8220;model.&#8221;  Oak Ridge people have decided how to estimate the day/night populations based on census data and ancillary data, e.g., journey to work, work location, etc. data.  Census data is not perfect, but it is what it says, the result of a known method of surveying resident populations.  Until I could look under the hood of this model, I&#8217;d regard it as interesting, but not to be trusted very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York City population by day and night &#124; Doobybrain.com</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>New York City population by day and night &#124; Doobybrain.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Steven over at Spatiality has graciously done the research and found out that the image above is part of a larger November [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steven over at Spatiality has graciously done the research and found out that the image above is part of a larger November [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Romalewski</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Romalewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the follow up!  Glad my post was helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow up!  Glad my post was helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobybrain</title>
		<link>http://spatialityblog.com/2009/08/22/map-source-found/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobybrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialityblog.com/?p=68#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Good research here. I couldn&#039;t seem to verify the Time 2007 statement but it looks like you have and I will be updating my post with the relevant information. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good research here. I couldn&#8217;t seem to verify the Time 2007 statement but it looks like you have and I will be updating my post with the relevant information. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
